In an 1999 editorial essay in the Journal of Marketing, Day and Montgomery enumerated the following as issues fundamental to
marketing:
· How do customers and consumers really behave?
· How do markets function and evolve?
· How do firms relate to their markets?
· What are the contributions of marketing to organizational performance and societal welfare?
In a 1991 editorial essay in the Strategic Management Journal, Schendel listed the following as research issues fundamental to
strategy:
· Why do firms differ?
· How do firms behave?
· How does the policy making process affect policy outcomes?
· What is the role of the corporate headquarters in multi-business firms?
· What explains success and failure of firms?
In a 1998 survey of the members of the American Marketing Association (AMA) Marketing Strategy Special Interest Group (SIG), I elicited member responses to the following question:
“Given your construal of the general domain of marketing strategy, what do you view as some issues fundamental to the field? Please phrase your responses in the form of questions (e.g., why do …; how do …; what is …; what explains …; when does …; is …).”
Summarized below are the responses (edited) from 35 marketing academicians.
The issues fundamental to marketing strategy are:
· Understanding, explaining and predicting competitive behavior
· Customer acquisition and retention
· Measuring, meeting and managing customers’ expectations
· Optimal allocation of marketing resources
· Defining and delineating the strategic role of marketing in organizations
· Creation, managing and leveraging of brand equity, customer / customer relationship equity, channel / channel relationship equity, market knowledge and marketing knowledge
· How to compete and where to compete?
· How does marketing strategy create economic value?
· How do various elements of the marketing mix, individually and in combination impact on business/product/brand performance?
· How does marketing strategy contribute to a business’ sustainable competitive advantage?
· How does (should) the marketing function interact with other functional areas to create sustainable competitive advantage and superior business performance?
· How do (should) businesses incorporate customers’ and competitors’ perspectives in marketing strategy decisions?
· What explains the choice of a competitive marketing strategy from among alternatives by a business in an industry?
· How do firms learn about markets?
· What is the theoretical basis for distinguishing marketing strategy from business strategy?
· What are the principles of marketing strategy?
· What theories, principles, constructs, premises, axioms and maxims are fundamental to the field of marketing strategy?
· How is competitive equilibrium reached over time?
· How can (when should) a business accelerate market penetration?
· How can (when should) a business pursue preemptive defense?
· When do (when should) firms cannibalize their own product offerings?
· When should (under what conditions should) strategic alliances be pursued?
According to Day and Montgomery (1999), fundamental issues are those that are
enduring to a field of study,
amenable to accommodating new insights and approaches, and
distinguish a field of study from related fields and contributing disciplines. Fundamental issues serve to
establish the identity of a field of study, distinguish it from other fields and disciplines, and compel further research inquiry.
Which among the issues in foregoing list meet the criteria to be viewed as fundamental issues?
Are there other issues that you believe are fundamental to marketing strategy?Issues fundamental to a field of study cannot be a long list. Clearly, the above list needs to be critically evaluated and pruned.Listed below are issues that I view as fundamental to marketing strategy:
1. Understanding, explaining and predicting the marketplace behavior of businesses that entail the deployment of marketing resources. Here, marketplace behavior refers to a business’ actions directed at customers, competitors and channel members. Deployment of marketing resources refers to a business’ present and planned pattern of deployment and amount of deployment of marketing resources. Patter refers to specific types of marketing resources deployed and allocation of total amount of resources by resource types.
An alternative perspective of issues fundamental to marketing strategy are the following, stated in the form of questions.
·
Why do competing businesses
behave the way they behave in the marketplace? (
What explains the competitive marketplace
behavior of businesses?)
· How do the characteristics of the focal business, the characteristics and behavior of its competitors and customers, and characteristics of the industry and the macro environment influence its behavior in the marketplace, and why?
· How should a businesses deploy marketing resources at its disposal under specific organizational, industry structural, and environmental conditions, and why?
2. Given that a business’ marketing strategy decisions are based on both supply side and demand side considerations, the supply side and demand side perspective of an issue fundamental to marketing strategy can be stated as follows:
· Supply Side Perspective: How does (should) a business choose to deploy marketing resources at its disposal to compete in the marketplace in the context of the structural characteristics of the market in which it operates, competitors’ characteristics and behavior, and its own characteristics?
· Demand Side Perspective: How does (should) a business choose to deploy marketing resources at its disposal to compete in the marketplace in the context of buyer characteristics and behavior?
3. Another issues that can be viewed as fundamental to marketing strategy is understanding, explaining and predicting the:
· Antecedents of a business’ competitive marketplace behavior -- organizational and environmental antecedents.
· Outcomes of a business’ competitive marketplace behavior -- competitive positional advantages, marketplace performance (customers’ responses to a business’ competitive marketplace behavior), and financial performance.
· Moderators of the relationship between a business’ competitive marketplace behavior and outcomes.
· Mediators of the relationship between a business’ competitive marketplace behavior and outcomes.
I look forward to your comments and reactions to the proposed list of issues fundamental to marketing strategy. Are there redundancies?Do they meet Day and Montgomery’s (1999) criteria to be viewed as issues fundamental to marketing strategy?References
Day, George S. and David B. Montgomery (1999), “Charting New Directions for Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 3-13.
Schendel, Dan E. (1991), “Editor’s Comments on Winter Special Issue,” Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Winter Special Issue), 1-3.